throng bout this question to treat the C.. J.
with something less than strich faimuras
should like to woont out to homi
the facts as to for W. Res dros Experienci
On
the Bar
مه
summarized at "×Y"
16079.
6.11. of the minutes on
and to
Bat
on is of these parti
Six W. Mee Tara's concott wearched Judes "who with never hom
Gres in prevali fraction
aut
Barrister
or has been untuccessful tencreen"
h
the
As regards the confidential "ofrouicus" of
local bassisters (inclures ist weig
it was to prerfectly, possible to extract
ther Fubstance of Awar (no cost)
withat
violation of confidenc
|
and present it to the C..J. in such
a pour
as to supplement and <laterali para 4 of the
solom china (sued 4 with 10791.
-I do not press the overeention
W
cruis
of the Groom wluctamu to adopt it, lest at the with we meat front aut
to how that to the C.J. is to b
left in the dark
to the criticien
we lokal Bar of las judicial
mimiliation he cannot in
common factors to blamed of the deals with them as
Fast's caller than they thumachers
dasın
To deman's refores of a C.J and to
Keep him regnorant of circumstan
MC Emmens
haumen
which reform many
ustal bearing
the ExEnt to
h practicath is
playing the quee.
The be vislation shege goted in har
on the right huis.
Mobadly We recently had the
Idad
not
z ci
same difficulting in
A colonial haw Socisty
381
vig consisting of one few members can hardly in Exhuclid wheways to deat
fartenfutte, with in tlack sheep lines same member of the investigating
hossibly has charges
hand wi
Committe
havemanje
usdam
مسا
metus cars!
HA.
cafe fro
1
agree
AEC
5.11
G.G. 4.1.15
Al-Mu
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.